| Title |
Time-Limited Trials for Patients With Critical Illness A Review of the Literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEST, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.chest.2023.12.014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline M Kruser, Nandita R Nadig, Elizabeth M Viglianti, Justin T Clapp, Katharine E Secunda, Scott D Halpern |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 13 | 26% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,344,030
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#1,060
of 13,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,309
of 363,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#3
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.