| Title |
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1161/cir.0000000000000485 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emelia J Benjamin, Michael J Blaha, Stephanie E Chiuve, Mary Cushman, Sandeep R Das, Rajat Deo, Sarah D de Ferranti, James Floyd, Myriam Fornage, Cathleen Gillespie, Carmen R Isasi, Monik C Jiménez, Lori Chaffin Jordan, Suzanne E Judd, Daniel Lackland, Judith H Lichtman, Lynda Lisabeth, Simin Liu, Chris T Longenecker, Rachel H Mackey, Kunihiro Matsushita, Dariush Mozaffarian, Michael E Mussolino, Khurram Nasir, Robert W Neumar, Latha Palaniappan, Dilip K Pandey, Ravi R Thiagarajan, Mathew J Reeves, Matthew Ritchey, Carlos J Rodriguez, Gregory A Roth, Wayne D Rosamond, Comilla Sasson, Amytis Towfighi, Connie W Tsao, Melanie B Turner, Salim S Virani, Jenifer H Voeks, Joshua Z Willey, John T Wilkins, Jason Hy Wu, Heather M Alger, Sally S Wong, Paul Muntner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 80% |
| Scientists | 7 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6,462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 6454 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 819 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 810 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 783 | 12% |
| Researcher | 640 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 462 | 7% |
| Other | 1301 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1647 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1551 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 519 | 8% |
| Engineering | 497 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 403 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 284 | 4% |
| Other | 1235 | 19% |
| Unknown | 1973 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1437. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,640
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#36
of 21,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138
of 424,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#1
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.