Title |
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with high-risk symptomatic native aortic regurgitation (ALIGN-AR): a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02806-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Torsten P Vahl, Vinod H Thourani, Raj R Makkar, Nadira Hamid, Omar K Khalique, David Daniels, James M McCabe, Lowell Satler, Mark Russo, Wen Cheng, Isaac George, Gabriel Aldea, Brett Sheridan, Dean Kereiakes, Harsh Golwala, Firas Zahr, Stanley Chetcuti, Pradeep Yadav, Susheel K Kodali, Hendrik Treede, Stephan Baldus, Nicholas Amoroso, Lauren S Ranard, Duane S Pinto, Martin B Leon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 21 | 20% |
Germany | 5 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
Mexico | 3 | 3% |
India | 3 | 3% |
South Africa | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Nepal | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 46 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 67 | 65% |
Scientists | 20 | 19% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#583,206
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#5,206
of 43,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,203
of 284,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#63
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.