| Title |
Green Space and Internalizing or Externalizing Symptoms Among Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5742 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nissa Towe-Goodman, Kristen L. McArthur, Michael Willoughby, Margaret M. Swingler, Cara Wychgram, Allan C. Just, Itai Kloog, Deborah H. Bennett, Daniel Berry, Marnie F. Hazlehurst, Peter James, Marcia Pescador Jimenez, Jin-Shei Lai, Leslie D. Leve, Lisa Gatzke-Kopp, Julie B. Schweitzer, Traci A. Bekelman, Catrina Calub, Susan Carnell, Sean Deoni, Viren D’Sa, Carrie Kelly, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell, Michael Petriello, Gita Thapaliya, Rosalind J. Wright, Xueying Zhang, Amii M. Kress, P Brian Smith, L Kristen Newby, Lisa P Jacobson, Diane J Catellier, Richard C Gershon, David Cella, Dana Dabelea, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Caherine J Karr, Frances Tylavsky, Alex Mason, Qi Zhao, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Nicole Bush, Kaja Z LeWinn, Jody M Ganiban, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Jean Kerver, Charles Barone, Chris Fussman, Nigel Paneth, Michael R Elliott, Douglas M. Ruden, Rosalind J Wright, Michelle Bosquet-Enlow, Leonardo Trasande, Ruby HN Nguyen, Emily S Barrett, Emily Oken, Robert O Wright, Sean CL Deoni, Daphne M Koinis-Mitchell, Manish Arora, Lianne (Elizabeth A) Sheppard, Shanna H Swan, James Cajka, Clancy Blair, W. Benjamin Goodman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 18% |
| India | 9 | 13% |
| Germany | 6 | 9% |
| China | 2 | 3% |
| Maldives | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 32 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 51% |
| Scientists | 20 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 22% |
| Professor | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Psychology | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1339. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2024.
All research outputs
#9,937
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#108
of 10,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162
of 289,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#4
of 526 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 127.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 526 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.