| Title |
Differences in Mentor-Mentee Sponsorship in Male vs Female Recipients of National Institutes of Health Grants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9391 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth W. Patton, Kent A. Griffith, Rochelle D. Jones, Abigail Stewart, Peter A. Ubel, Reshma Jagsi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 294 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 152 | 52% |
| Canada | 16 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 83 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 133 | 45% |
| Scientists | 96 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 54 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 19% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 53% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 329. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2021.
All research outputs
#103,122
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#670
of 11,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,394
of 324,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#37
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.