| Title |
How warm was the last interglacial? New modeldata comparisons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsta.2013.0097 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bette L. Otto-Bliesner, Nan Rosenbloom, Emma J. Stone, Nicholas P. McKay, Daniel J. Lunt, Esther C. Brady, Jonathan T. Overpeck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| France | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Antarctica | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 86% |
| Scientists | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Researcher | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 85 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#827,842
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
#186
of 3,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,212
of 228,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.