↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Gender Differences in Salary in a Recent Cohort of Early-Career Physician–Researchers

Overview of attention for article published in Academic medicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
49 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Gender Differences in Salary in a Recent Cohort of Early-Career Physician–Researchers
Published in
Academic medicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1097/acm.0b013e3182a71519
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reshma Jagsi, Kent A. Griffith, Abigail Stewart, Dana Sambuco, Rochelle DeCastro, Peter A. Ubel

Abstract

Studies have suggested that male physicians earn more than their female counterparts. The authors examined whether this disparity exists in a recently hired cohort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 84 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 41%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Psychology 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#580,527
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Academic medicine
#173
of 6,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,839
of 226,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic medicine
#1
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.