Title |
Disparities in Evaluation of Patients With Rectal Bleeding 40 Years and Older
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Helen M. Shields, Elena M. Stoffel, Daniel C. Chung, Thomas D. Sequist, Justin W. Li, Stephen R. Pelletier, Justin Spencer, Jean M. Silk, Bonita L. Austin, Susan Diguette, Jean E. Furbish, Ruth Lederman, Saul N. Weingart |
Abstract |
Rectal bleeding is associated with colorectal cancer. We characterized the evaluation of patients aged 40 years and older with rectal bleeding and identified characteristics associated with inadequate evaluation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 18 | 62% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 48% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 31% |
Scientists | 5 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 22% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Librarian | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 36% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,805,603
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#762
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,192
of 209,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#9
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.