↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Nivolumab versus standard, single-agent therapy of investigator's choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 141): health-related quality-of-life…

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Oncology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
38 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
337 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
Nivolumab versus standard, single-agent therapy of investigator's choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 141): health-related quality-of-life results from a randomised, phase 3 trial
Published in
Lancet Oncology, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30421-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin J Harrington, Robert L Ferris, George Blumenschein, A Dimitrios Colevas, Jérôme Fayette, Lisa Licitra, Stefan Kasper, Caroline Even, Everett E Vokes, Francis Worden, Nabil F Saba, Naomi Kiyota, Robert Haddad, Makoto Tahara, Viktor Grünwald, James W Shaw, Manish Monga, Mark Lynch, Fiona Taylor, Michael DeRosa, Laura Morrissey, Kim Cocks, Maura L Gillison, Joël Guigay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 298 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 15%
Other 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Student > Master 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 57 19%
Unknown 94 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 107 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#431,982
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#550
of 6,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,115
of 333,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#13
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.