| Title |
Bar-coding Surgical Sponges To Improve Safety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgery, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181656cd5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caprice C. Greenberg, Rafael Diaz-Flores, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Scott E. Regenbogen, Lynn Mulholland, Francine Mearn, Shilpa Rao, Tamara Toidze, Atul A. Gawande |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 23% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 34% |
| Engineering | 11 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 234. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#164,040
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#63
of 9,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254
of 96,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.