| Title |
Sleep disturbances and severe stress as glial activators: key targets for treating central sensitization in chronic pain patients?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1080/14728222.2017.1353603 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo Nijs, Marco L. Loggia, Andrea Polli, Maarten Moens, Eva Huysmans, Lisa Goudman, Mira Meeus, Luc Vanderweeën, Kelly Ickmans, Daniel Clauw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 153 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 16% |
| Spain | 21 | 14% |
| Australia | 11 | 7% |
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 49 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 116 | 76% |
| Scientists | 22 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 385 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 88 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
| Researcher | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 82 | 21% |
| Unknown | 92 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 86 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 4% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 10% |
| Unknown | 110 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#281,268
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
#5
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,904
of 328,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.