↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Age-related and disease-related muscle loss: the effect of diabetes, obesity, and other diseases

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
47 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
793 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
860 Mendeley
Title
Age-related and disease-related muscle loss: the effect of diabetes, obesity, and other diseases
Published in
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/s2213-8587(14)70034-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rita Rastogi Kalyani, Mark Corriere, Luigi Ferrucci

Abstract

The term sarcopenia refers to the loss of muscle mass that occurs with ageing. On the basis of study results showing that muscle mass is only moderately related to functional outcomes, international working groups have proposed that loss of muscle strength or physical function should also be included in the definition. Irrespective of how sarcopenia is defined, both low muscle mass and poor muscle strength are clearly highly prevalent and important risk factors for disability and potentially mortality in individuals as they age. Many chronic diseases, in addition to ageing, could also accelerate decrease of muscle mass and strength, and this effect could be a main underlying mechanism by which chronic diseases cause physical disability. In this Review, we address both age-related and disease-related muscle loss, with a focus on diabetes and obesity but including other disease states, and potential common mechanisms and treatments. Development of treatments for age-related and disease-related muscle loss might improve active life expectancy in older people, and lead to substantial health-care savings and improved quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 860 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 852 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 122 14%
Student > Master 121 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 13%
Researcher 89 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 5%
Other 136 16%
Unknown 240 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 191 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 94 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 8%
Sports and Recreations 60 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 6%
Other 99 12%
Unknown 297 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#435,065
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
#368
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,685
of 237,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
#6
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.