↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Cervical spine evaluation and clearance in the intoxicated patient

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 7,829)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
224 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Cervical spine evaluation and clearance in the intoxicated patient
Published in
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The, December 2017
DOI 10.1097/ta.0000000000001650
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J. Martin, Lisa D. Bush, Kenji Inaba, Saskya Byerly, Martin Schreiber, Kimberly A. Peck, Galinos Barmparas, Jay Menaker, Joshua P. Hazelton, Raul Coimbra, Martin D. Zielinski, Carlos V.R. Brown, Chad G. Ball, Jill R. Cherry-Bukowiec, Clay Cothren Burlew, Julie Dunn, C. Todd Minshall, Matthew M. Carrick, Gina M. Berg, Demetrios Demetriades, William Long

Abstract

Intoxication often prevents clinical clearance of the cervical spine (Csp) after trauma leading to prolonged immobilization even with a normal CT scan. We evaluated the accuracy of CT at detecting clinically significant Csp injury, and surveyed participants on related opinions and practice. A prospective multicenter study (2013-2015) at 17 centers. All adult blunt trauma patients underwent structured clinical examination and imaging including a Csp CT, with follow-up thru discharge. EtOH and drug intoxicated patients (TOX+) were identified by serum and/or urine testing. Primary outcomes included the incidence and type of Csp injuries, the accuracy of CT scan, and the impact of TOX+ on the time to Csp clearance. A 36-item survey querying local protocols, practices, and opinions in the TOX+ population was administered. 10,191 patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent CT Csp during the initial trauma evaluation. The majority were male (67%), vehicular trauma or falls (83%), with mean age=48, and mean ISS=11. The overall incidence of Csp injury was 10.6%. TOX+ comprised 30% of the cohort (19% EtOH only, 6% drug only, and 5% both). TOX+ were significantly younger (41 vs 51, p<0.01) but with similar mean ISS (11) and GCS (13). The TOX+ cohort had a lower incidence of Csp injury vs non-intoxicated (8.4 vs 11.5%, p<0.01). In the TOX+ group, CT had a sens=94%, spec=99.5%, and NPV=99.5% for all Csp injuries. For clinically significant injuries, the NPV was 99.9%, and there were no unstable Csp injuries missed by CT (NPV=100%). When CT Csp was negative, TOX+ led to longer immobilization vs sober patients (mean 8 hrs vs 2 hrs, p<0.01), and prolonged immobilization (>12hrs) in 25%. The survey showed marked variations in protocols, definitions, and Csp clearance practices among participating centers, although 100% indicated willingness to change practice based on this data. For intoxicated patients undergoing Csp imaging, CT scan was highly accurate and reliable for identifying clinically significant spine injuries, and had a 100% NPV for identifying unstable injuries. CT-based clearance in TOX+ patients appears safe and may avoid unnecessary prolonged immobilization. There was wide disparity in practices, definitions, and opinions among the participating centers. Level II, Diagnostic Tests or Criteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 224 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2019.
All research outputs
#271,254
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#34
of 7,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,830
of 447,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#1
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.