↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Internet Guidance on Time Out

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,742)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Internet Guidance on Time Out
Published in
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, May 2014
DOI 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy K. Drayton, Melissa N. Andersen, Rachel M. Knight, Barbara T. Felt, Emily M. Fredericks, Dawn J. Dore-Stites

Abstract

Pediatricians are frequently asked to address parents' behavioral concerns. Time out (TO) is one of the few discipline strategies with empirical support and is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. However, correctly performed, TO can be a complex procedure requiring training difficult to provide in clinic due to time and cost constraints. The Internet may be a resource for parents to supplement information provided by pediatricians. The present study included evaluation of information on TO contained in websites frequently accessed by parents. It was hypothesized that significant differences exist between the empirically supported parameters of TO and website-based information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#203,214
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
#27
of 1,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,598
of 242,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.