| Title |
High prevalence of somatic MAP2K1 mutations in BRAF V600E–negative Langerhans cell histiocytosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1182/blood-2014-05-577361 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noah A Brown, Larissa V Furtado, Bryan L Betz, Mark J Kiel, Helmut C Weigelin, Megan S Lim, Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 38% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 3% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 59% |
| Scientists | 10 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 23% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,953,068
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#1,930
of 33,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,997
of 245,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#27
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.