↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Flawed Self-Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 131)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
23 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1375 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1240 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Flawed Self-Assessment
Published in
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Dunning, Chip Heath, Jerry M. Suls

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 27 2%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Canada 7 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
New Zealand 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 14 1%
Unknown 1164 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 261 21%
Student > Master 190 15%
Researcher 111 9%
Student > Bachelor 101 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 81 7%
Other 288 23%
Unknown 208 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 352 28%
Social Sciences 166 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 95 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 92 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 42 3%
Other 244 20%
Unknown 249 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 294. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#120,460
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science in the Public Interest
#21
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,445
of 374,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science in the Public Interest
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 191.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.