↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Combined Small Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: Is It a Single Entity?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Combined Small Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: Is It a Single Entity?
Published in
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.10.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoliang Zhao, Justine N. McCutcheon, Bhaskar Kallakury, Joeffrey J Chahine, Drew Pratt, Mark Raffeld, Yulong Chen, Changli Wang, Giuseppe Giaccone

Abstract

Small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) accounts for 15-20% of all lung cancers, with combined SCLC (CSCLC) comprising 2-5%. Little is known about the clinical characteristics and molecular changes associated with the various histologic components. 205 SCLC cases were resected between 2005-2015. Clinical and pathologic features were analyzed. All CSCLC cases were confirmed by histology and immunohistochemistry. The individual components were microdissected using a novel automated dissection system and DNA was extracted and subjected to targeted exome sequencing. Ten cases of combined CSCLC were identified out of 170 cases with adequate histologic material; squamous cell carcinoma made up the second component in half of these (n=5). There were no significant differences between CSCLC and pure SCLC with respect to clinical features. The median follow-up time was 36 months. Median survival times of pure and CSCLC patients were 58 months and 26 months, respectively (p=0.030). The different components of 3 combined cases were deemed adequate for microdissection and sequencing. Approximately 75% of the identified somatic mutations were present in both components. There were also 15 gene mutations or 6 amplifications unique to only one of the components. We identified no significant clinical or pathologic differences between pure and CSCLC; CSCLC was associated with decreased overall survival compared to pure SCLC. The histologic components of CSCLC had high genetic concordance, but also showed divergent genotypes. These findings may suggest a common precursor with subsequent acquisition of oncogenic changes in CSCLC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 21%
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 42%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,617,928
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#667
of 3,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,192
of 340,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#26
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.