| Title |
Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fusion–Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2014.17942 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Minhaj Siddiqui, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Baris Turkbey, Arvin K. George, Jason Rothwax, Nabeel Shakir, Chinonyerem Okoro, Dima Raskolnikov, Howard L. Parnes, W. Marston Linehan, Maria J. Merino, Richard M. Simon, Peter L. Choyke, Bradford J. Wood, Peter A. Pinto |
| Abstract |
Targeted magnetic resonance (MR)/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy has been shown to detect prostate cancer. The implications of targeted biopsy alone vs standard extended-sextant biopsy or the 2 modalities combined are not well understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 204 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 63 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 5% |
| Spain | 9 | 4% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| France | 7 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 67 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 119 | 58% |
| Scientists | 45 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 705 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 691 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 115 | 16% |
| Other | 82 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 63 | 9% |
| Other | 188 | 27% |
| Unknown | 122 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 355 | 50% |
| Engineering | 44 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 75 | 11% |
| Unknown | 183 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 451. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#62,469
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,196
of 36,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#610
of 366,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#11
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.