↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Guidelines of care for the management of basal cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
295 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
549 Mendeley
Title
Guidelines of care for the management of basal cell carcinoma
Published in
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Work Group, Christopher Bichakjian, April Armstrong, Christian Baum, Jeremy S. Bordeaux, Marc Brown, Klaus J. Busam, Daniel B. Eisen, Vivek Iyengar, Clifford Lober, David J. Margolis, Jane Messina, Alexander Miller, Stanley Miller, Eliot Mostow, Christen Mowad, Kishwer Nehal, Kristi Schmitt-Burr, Aleksandar Sekulic, Paul Storrs, Joyce Teng, Siegrid Yu, Conway Huang, Kevin Boyer, Wendy Smith Begolka, Murad Alam, Invited Reviewers, John Y.S. Kim, Jeffrey H. Kozlow, Bharat Mittal, Jeffrey Moyer, Thomas Olencki, Phillip Rodgers

Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of human cancer, with a continually increasing annual incidence in the United States. When diagnosed early, the majority of BCCs are readily treated with office-based therapy, which is highly curative. In these evidence-based guidelines of care, we provide recommendations for the management of patients with BCC, as well as an in-depth review of the best available literature in support of these recommendations. We discuss biopsy techniques for a clinically suspicious lesion and offer recommendations for the histopathologic interpretation of BCC. In the absence of a formal staging system, the best available stratification based on risk for recurrence is reviewed. With regard to treatment, we provide recommendations on treatment modalities along a broad therapeutic spectrum, ranging from topical agents and superficially destructive modalities to surgical techniques and systemic therapy. Finally, we review the available literature and provide recommendations on prevention and the most appropriate follow-up for patients in whom BCC has been diagnosed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 549 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 545 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 70 13%
Student > Postgraduate 61 11%
Other 60 11%
Student > Master 41 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 7%
Other 112 20%
Unknown 168 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 258 47%
Unspecified 18 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 2%
Other 45 8%
Unknown 186 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#400,436
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#207
of 10,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,279
of 451,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#8
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.