| Title |
Protective Effect of Toll-like Receptor 4 in Pulmonary Vaccinia Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Pathogens, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000153 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martha A. Hutchens, Kathryn E. Luker, Joanne Sonstein, Gabriel Núñez, Jeffrey L. Curtis, Gary D. Luker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 28 | 22% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Greece | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Antarctica | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 124 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Scientists | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 28% |
| Researcher | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 50% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#476,731
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#370
of 9,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#912
of 98,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.