| Title |
Position paper for the organization of ECMO programs for cardiac failure in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5064-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darryl Abrams, A. Reshad Garan, Akram Abdelbary, Matthew Bacchetta, Robert H. Bartlett, James Beck, Jan Belohlavek, Yih-Sharng Chen, Eddy Fan, Niall D. Ferguson, Jo-anne Fowles, John Fraser, Michelle Gong, Ibrahim F. Hassan, Carol Hodgson, Xiaotong Hou, Katarzyna Hryniewicz, Shingo Ichiba, William A. Jakobleff, Roberto Lorusso, Graeme MacLaren, Shay McGuinness, Thomas Mueller, Pauline K. Park, Giles Peek, Vin Pellegrino, Susanna Price, Erika B. Rosenzweig, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Leonardo Salazar, Matthieu Schmidt, Arthur S. Slutsky, Christian Spaulding, Hiroo Takayama, Koji Takeda, Alain Vuylsteke, Alain Combes, Daniel Brodie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 16 | 13% |
| United States | 12 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 7% |
| Italy | 6 | 5% |
| France | 5 | 4% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 20% |
| Scientists | 14 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 223 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 25% |
| Unknown | 68 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 81 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#517,610
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#468
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,231
of 476,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.