↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Impact of In‐Hospital Death on Spending for Bereaved Spouses

Overview of attention for article published in Health Services Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
44 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Impact of In‐Hospital Death on Spending for Bereaved Spouses
Published in
Health Services Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1111/1475-6773.12841
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine A. Ornstein, Melissa M. Garrido, Albert L. Siu, Evan Bollens‐Lund, Kenneth M. Langa, Amy S. Kelley

Abstract

To examine how patients' location of death relates to health care utilization and spending for surviving spouses. Health and Retirement Study (HRS) 2000-2012 linked to the Dartmouth Atlas and Medicare claims data. This was an observational study. We matched bereaved spouses whose spouses died in a hospital to those whose spouses died outside the hospital using propensity scores based on decedent and spouse demographic and clinical characteristics, care preferences, and regional practice patterns. We identified 1,348 HRS decedents with surviving spouses. We linked HRS data from each dyad with Medicare claims and regional characteristics. In multivariable models, bereaved spouses of decedents who died in the hospital had $3,106 higher Medicare spending 12 months postdeath (p = .04) compared to those whose spouses died outside a hospital. Those surviving spouses were also significantly more likely to have an ED visit (OR = 1.5; p < .01) and hospital admission (OR = 1.4; p = .02) in the year after their spouse's in-hospital death. Increased Medicare spending for surviving spouses persisted through the 24-month period postdeath ($5,310; p = .02). Bereaved spouses of decedents who died in the hospital had significantly greater Medicare spending and health care utilization themselves after their spouses' death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 16 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Psychology 3 8%
Mathematics 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,265,145
of 24,694,993 outputs
Outputs from Health Services Research
#270
of 2,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,313
of 335,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services Research
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,694,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.