↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
182 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
Title
Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Published in
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, April 2018
DOI 10.1038/nrdp.2018.20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angel Lanas, Jean-Marc Dumonceau, Richard H. Hunt, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, James M. Scheiman, Ian M. Gralnek, Helen E. Campbell, Alaa Rostom, Càndid Villanueva, Joseph J. Y. Sung

Abstract

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is bleeding that develops in the oesophagus, stomach or proximal duodenum. Peptic ulcers, caused by Helicobacter pylori infection or use of NSAIDs and low-dose aspirin (LDA), are the most common cause. Although the incidence and mortality associated with NVUGIB have been decreasing owing to considerable advances in the prevention and management of NVUGIB over the past 20 years, it remains a common clinical problem with an annual incidence of ∼67 per 100,000 individuals in the United States in 2012. NVUGIB is a medical emergency, and mortality is in the range ∼1-5%. After resuscitation and initial assessment, early (within 24 hours) diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy together with intragastric pH control with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) form the basis of treatment. With a growing ageing population treated with antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant medications, the clinical management of NVUGIB is complex as the risk between gastrointestinal bleeding events and adverse cardiovascular events needs to be balanced. The best clinical approach includes identification of risk factors and prevention of bleeding; available strategies include continuous treatment with PPIs or H. pylori eradication in those at increased risk of developing NVUGIB. Treatment with PPIs and/or use of cyclooxygenase-2-selective NSAIDs should be implemented in those patients at risk of NVUGIB who need NSAIDs and/or LDA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 182 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 340 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 16%
Student > Postgraduate 40 12%
Other 25 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Researcher 19 6%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 134 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 <1%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 139 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#336,072
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#144
of 796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,527
of 342,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.