| Title |
Perceived Discrimination and Mortality in a Population-Based Study of Older Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Public Health, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2105/ajph.2007.114397 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa L. Barnes, Carlos F. Mendes de Leon, Tené T. Lewis, Julia L. Bienias, Robert S. Wilson, Denis A. Evans |
| Abstract |
We examined the relation of individual-level perceived discrimination to mortality in a biracial, population-based sample. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 69% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 22% |
| Unknown | 34 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 608. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#37,802
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Public Health
#127
of 12,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39
of 98,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Public Health
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.