| Title |
Recent Asian origin of chytrid fungi causing global amphibian declines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aar1965 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon J O'Hanlon, Adrien Rieux, Rhys A Farrer, Gonçalo M Rosa, Bruce Waldman, Arnaud Bataille, Tiffany A Kosch, Kris A Murray, Balázs Brankovics, Matteo Fumagalli, Michael D Martin, Nathan Wales, Mario Alvarado-Rybak, Kieran A Bates, Lee Berger, Susanne Böll, Lola Brookes, Frances Clare, Elodie A Courtois, Andrew A Cunningham, Thomas M Doherty-Bone, Pria Ghosh, David J Gower, William E Hintz, Jacob Höglund, Thomas S Jenkinson, Chun-Fu Lin, Anssi Laurila, Adeline Loyau, An Martel, Sara Meurling, Claude Miaud, Pete Minting, Frank Pasmans, Dirk S Schmeller, Benedikt R Schmidt, Jennifer M G Shelton, Lee F Skerratt, Freya Smith, Claudio Soto-Azat, Matteo Spagnoletti, Giulia Tessa, Luís Felipe Toledo, Andrés Valenzuela-Sánchez, Ruhan Verster, Judit Vörös, Rebecca J Webb, Claudia Wierzbicki, Emma Wombwell, Kelly R Zamudio, David M Aanensen, Timothy Y James, M Thomas P Gilbert, Ché Weldon, Jaime Bosch, François Balloux, Trenton W J Garner, Matthew C Fisher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 896 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 125 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 86 | 10% |
| Australia | 34 | 4% |
| Chile | 27 | 3% |
| Canada | 26 | 3% |
| Japan | 14 | 2% |
| France | 13 | 1% |
| Germany | 12 | 1% |
| Spain | 12 | 1% |
| Other | 138 | 15% |
| Unknown | 409 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 587 | 66% |
| Scientists | 267 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 30 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 808 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 808 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 145 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 117 | 14% |
| Researcher | 116 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 13% |
| Other | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 106 | 13% |
| Unknown | 189 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 316 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 96 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 91 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 30 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 6% |
| Unknown | 214 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1558. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,465
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Science
#404
of 83,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118
of 340,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#12
of 1,220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.