↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Extracellular vesicles direct migration by synthesizing and releasing chemotactic signals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Extracellular vesicles direct migration by synthesizing and releasing chemotactic signals
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, June 2018
DOI 10.1083/jcb.201710170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul W. Kriebel, Ritankar Majumdar, Lisa M. Jenkins, Hiroshi Senoo, Weiye Wang, Sonia Ammu, Song Chen, Kedar Narayan, Miho Iijima, Carole A. Parent

Abstract

Chemotactic signals are relayed to neighboring cells through the secretion of additional chemoattractants. We previously showed in Dictyostelium discoideum that the adenylyl cyclase A, which synthesizes the chemoattractant cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), is present in the intraluminal vesicles of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) that coalesce at the back of cells. Using ultrastructural reconstructions, we now show that ACA-containing MVBs release their contents to attract neighboring cells. We show that the released vesicles are capable of directing migration and streaming and are central to chemotactic signal relay. We demonstrate that the released vesicles not only contain cAMP but also can actively synthesize and release cAMP to promote chemotaxis. Through proteomic, pharmacological, and genetic approaches, we determined that the vesicular cAMP is released via the ABCC8 transporter. Together, our findings show that extracellular vesicles released by Ddiscoideum cells are functional entities that mediate signal relay during chemotaxis and streaming.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 30%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#835,247
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#259
of 11,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,211
of 342,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#16
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.