| Title |
Demonstration of high current densities and extended cycling in the garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Power Sources, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.06.055 |
| Authors |
Nathan J. Taylor, Sandra Stangeland-Molo, Catherine G. Haslam, Asma Sharafi, Travis Thompson, Michael Wang, Regina Garcia-Mendez, Jeff Sakamoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 25% |
| Researcher | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 61 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 61 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 30 | 14% |
| Engineering | 17 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 13 | 6% |
| Energy | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 77 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2018.
All research outputs
#416,137
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Power Sources
#23
of 9,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,929
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Power Sources
#2
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,671 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.