| Title |
Using Implementation Science to Adapt a Training Program to Assist Surgeons with High-Stakes Communication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Surgical Education, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.05.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren J Taylor, Sarah Adkins, Andrew W Hoel, Joshua Hauser, Pasithorn Suwanabol, Gordon Wood, Wendy Anderson, Carolina Branson, Steven Skube, Sara K Johnson, Amy Zelenski, Jennifer L Tucholka, Toby C Campbell, Margaret L Schwarze |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,886,542
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Surgical Education
#311
of 1,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,416
of 342,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Surgical Education
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.