↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancer: From Function to Translation

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Cancer, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
68 X users
patent
3 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancer: From Function to Translation
Published in
Trends in Cancer, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.trecan.2015.08.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anirban Sahu, Udit Singhal, Arul M. Chinnaiyan

Abstract

While our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer has significantly improved, most of our knowledge focuses on protein-coding genes that make up a fraction of the genome. Recent studies have uncovered thousands of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) that populate the cancer genome. A subset of these molecules shows striking cancer- and lineage-specific expression patterns, suggesting they may be potential drivers of cancer biology and have utility as clinical biomarkers. Here, we discuss emerging modalities of lncRNA biology and their interplay with cancer-associated concepts, including epigenetic regulation, DNA damage and cell cycle control, microRNA silencing, signal transduction pathways, and hormone-driven disease. Additionally, we highlight the translational impact of lncRNAs, tools for their mechanistic investigation, and directions for future lncRNA research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 156 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 25%
Researcher 32 20%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 29 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,031,396
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cancer
#94
of 841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,812
of 286,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cancer
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.