↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

A Multicenter Study Into Causes of Severe Acute Liver Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 4,727)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
440 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
A Multicenter Study Into Causes of Severe Acute Liver Injury
Published in
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony C Breu, Vilas R Patwardhan, Jennifer Nayor, Jalpan N Ringwala, Zachary G Devore, Rahul B Ganatra, Kelly E Hathorn, Laura Horton, Sentia Iriana, Elliot B Tapper

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level of ≥1000 IU/L often is stated to include 3 main etiologies: ischemic hepatitis, acute viral hepatitis (typically hepatitis A and hepatitis B), and drug-induced (more specifically, acetaminophen/paracetamol) liver injury (DILI).1 Unfortunately, there are a paucity of studies examining the most common causes of acute liver injury (ALI) and those that have been published have been small,2 single-center,2 or examined less severe increases in ALT or AST levels.3,4 We conducted a multicenter study of all patients with an ALT and/or AST level ≥1000 IU/L. Our study had 3 main goals: (1) to determine the most common causes of an ALT and/or AST level ≥1000 IU/L, along with their relative frequencies; (2) to determine differences in etiology based on hospital type (liver transplant center, community hospital, Veterans Affairs hospital); and (3) to confirm or disprove the differential heuristic that ischemic hepatitis, acute viral hepatitis, and acetaminophen toxicity are the most common etiologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 440 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 272. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#135,202
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#46
of 4,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,683
of 342,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#3
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.