↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
193 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2878 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1649 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline
Published in
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, September 2018
DOI 10.1164/rccm.201807-1255st
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ganesh Raghu, Martine Remy-Jardin, Jeffrey L Myers, Luca Richeldi, Christopher J Ryerson, David J Lederer, Juergen Behr, Vincent Cottin, Sonye K Danoff, Ferran Morell, Kevin R Flaherty, Athol Wells, Fernando J Martinez, Arata Azuma, Thomas J Bice, Demosthenes Bouros, Kevin K Brown, Harold R Collard, Abhijit Duggal, Liam Galvin, Yoshikazu Inoue, R Gisli Jenkins, Takeshi Johkoh, Ella A Kazerooni, Masanori Kitaichi, Shandra L Knight, George Mansour, Andrew G Nicholson, Sudhakar N J Pipavath, Ivette Buendía-Roldán, Moisés Selman, William D Travis, Simon Walsh, Kevin C Wilson

Abstract

This document provides clinical recommendations for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It represents a collaborative effort between the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by a multidisciplinary committee of IPF experts. The evidence was appraised and recommendations were formulated, written, and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The guideline panel updated the diagnostic criteria for IPF. Previously defined patterns of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) were refined to patterns of UIP, probable UIP, indeterminate, and alternate diagnosis. For patients with newly detected interstitial lung disease (ILD) who have a high-resolution computed tomography scan pattern of probable UIP, indeterminate, or an alternative diagnosis, conditional recommendations were made for performing BAL and surgical lung biopsy; because of lack of evidence, no recommendation was made for or against performing transbronchial lung biopsy or lung cryobiopsy. In contrast, for patients with newly detected ILD who have a high-resolution computed tomography scan pattern of UIP, strong recommendations were made against performing surgical lung biopsy, transbronchial lung biopsy, and lung cryobiopsy, and a conditional recommendation was made against performing BAL. Additional recommendations included a conditional recommendation for multidisciplinary discussion and a strong recommendation against measurement of serum biomarkers for the sole purpose of distinguishing IPF from other ILDs. The guideline panel provided recommendations related to the diagnosis of IPF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 193 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,649 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1649 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 210 13%
Other 182 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 130 8%
Student > Postgraduate 117 7%
Student > Bachelor 116 7%
Other 348 21%
Unknown 546 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 693 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 42 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 2%
Other 167 10%
Unknown 603 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#220,650
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#161
of 12,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,469
of 347,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#2
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.