↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Targeting G protein-coupled receptor signalling by blocking G proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
5 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
Title
Targeting G protein-coupled receptor signalling by blocking G proteins
Published in
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, September 2018
DOI 10.1038/nrd.2018.135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian P. Campbell, Alan V. Smrcka

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of drug targets, largely owing to their druggability, diversity and physiological efficacy. Many drugs selectively target specific subtypes of GPCRs, but high specificity for individual GPCRs may not be desirable in complex multifactorial disease states in which multiple receptors may be involved. One approach is to target G protein subunits rather than the GPCRs directly. This approach has the potential to achieve broad efficacy by blocking pathways shared by multiple GPCRs. Additionally, because many GPCRs couple to multiple G protein signalling pathways, blocking specific G protein subunits can 'bias' GPCR signals by inhibiting only a subset of these signals. Molecules that target G protein α or βγ-subunits have been developed and show strong efficacy in multiple preclinical disease models and biased inhibition of G protein signalling. In this Review, we discuss the development and characterization of G protein α and βγ-subunit ligands and the preclinical evidence that this exciting new approach has potential for therapeutic efficacy in a number of indications, such as pain, thrombosis, asthma and heart failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 326 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 21%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Researcher 36 11%
Student > Master 24 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 92 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 36 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 10%
Neuroscience 23 7%
Chemistry 20 6%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 103 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,287,417
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
#625
of 3,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,403
of 351,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
#14
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.