| Title |
Choosing appropriate prosthetic ankle work to reduce the metabolic cost of individuals with transtibial amputation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-33569-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kimberly A. Ingraham, Hwan Choi, Emily S. Gardinier, C. David Remy, Deanna H. Gates |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 39% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 6% |
| Liechtenstein | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 42 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#887,685
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#9,401
of 142,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,007
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#225
of 3,423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.