| Title |
Base-free nickel-catalysed decarbonylative Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of acid fluorides
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0628-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian A. Malapit, James R. Bour, Conor E. Brigham, Melanie S. Sanford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 57 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 30 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 227 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 151 | 67% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 51 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#632,064
of 25,390,203 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#25,542
of 97,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,747
of 357,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#615
of 1,137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.