| Title |
Case Studies in Social Medicine — Attending to Structural Forces in Clinical Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmms1814262 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott D Stonington, Seth M Holmes, Helena Hansen, Jeremy A Greene, Keith A Wailoo, Debra Malina, Stephen Morrissey, Paul E Farmer, Michael G Marmot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 240 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 63 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 9% |
| Canada | 19 | 8% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 1% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| Norway | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 97 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 126 | 53% |
| Scientists | 57 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 48 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 11% |
| Professor | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 24% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#227,086
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#4,179
of 32,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,382
of 358,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#89
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.