↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Mid-Term Valve-Related Outcomes After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve or Valve-in-Ring Replacement

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Mid-Term Valve-Related Outcomes After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve or Valve-in-Ring Replacement
Published in
JACC, January 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doff B. McElhinney, Jamil A. Aboulhosn, Danny Dvir, Brian Whisenant, Yulin Zhang, Andreas Eicken, Flavio Ribichini, Aphrodite Tzifa, Michael R. Hainstock, Mary H. Martin, Ran Kornowski, Stephan Schubert, Azeem Latib, John D.R. Thomson, Alejandro J. Torres, Jeffery Meadows, Jeffrey W. Delaney, Mayra E. Guerrero, Stefano Salizzoni, Howaida El-Said, Ariel Finkelstein, Isaac George, Marc Gewillig, Maria Alvarez-Fuente, Luke Lamers, Asim N. Cheema, Jacqueline N. Kreutzer, Tanja Rudolph, David Hildick-Smith, Allison K. Cabalka, VIVID Registry, Younes Boudjemline, Guiti Milani, Martin L. Bocks, Jeremy D. Asnes, Vaikom Mahadevan, Dominique Himbert, Bryan H. Goldstein, Thomas E. Fagan, John P. Cheatham, Tarek S. Momenah, Dennis W. Kim, Antonio Colombo, Marco Ancona, Gianfranco Butera, Thomas J. Forbes, Eric Horlick, Carlos Pedra, Jacopo Alfonsi, Thomas K. Jones, Susan Foerster, Shabana Shahanavaz, Ivory Crittendon, Dietmar Schranz, Athar Qureshi, Martyn Thomas, Damien P. Kenny, Mark Hoyer, Sabine Bleiziffer, Joelle Kefer, Luca Testa, Matthew Gillespie, Danyal Khan, Robert H. Pass, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Harindra Wijeysundera, Filip Casselman, Tabitha Moe, Nicholas Hayes, Oluseun Alli, Keshav R. Nayak, Priti Patel, Nicolo Piazza, Cameron Seaman, Stephan Windecker, James Kuo, Frank F. Ing, Raj R. Makkar, Martin Greif, Alfredo G. Cerillio, Didier Champagnac, Fabian Nietlispach, Francesco Maisano, Hendrik Treede, Moritz Seiffert, Rui Campante Teles, Gudrun Feuchtner, Nikolaos Bonaros, Giuseppe Bruschi, Gabriele Pesarini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 30 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,186,259
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#4,605
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,488
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#95
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.