| Title |
Opportunities and challenges for a maturing science of consciousness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Human Behaviour, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-019-0531-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthias Michel, Diane Beck, Ned Block, Hal Blumenfeld, Richard Brown, David Carmel, Marisa Carrasco, Mazviita Chirimuuta, Marvin Chun, Axel Cleeremans, Stanislas Dehaene, Stephen M. Fleming, Chris Frith, Patrick Haggard, Biyu J. He, Cecilia Heyes, Melvyn A. Goodale, Liz Irvine, Mitsuo Kawato, Robert Kentridge, Jean-Remi King, Robert T. Knight, Sid Kouider, Victor Lamme, Dominique Lamy, Hakwan Lau, Steven Laureys, Joseph LeDoux, Ying-Tung Lin, Kayuet Liu, Stephen L. Macknik, Susana Martinez-Conde, George A. Mashour, Lucia Melloni, Lisa Miracchi, Myrto Mylopoulos, Lionel Naccache, Adrian M. Owen, Richard E. Passingham, Luiz Pessoa, Megan A. K. Peters, Dobromir Rahnev, Tony Ro, David Rosenthal, Yuka Sasaki, Claire Sergent, Guillermo Solovey, Nicholas D. Schiff, Anil Seth, Catherine Tallon-Baudry, Marco Tamietto, Frank Tong, Simon van Gaal, Alexandra Vlassova, Takeo Watanabe, Josh Weisberg, Karen Yan, Masatoshi Yoshida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 244 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 10% |
| Canada | 13 | 5% |
| France | 13 | 5% |
| Japan | 12 | 5% |
| Germany | 7 | 3% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 94 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 151 | 62% |
| Scientists | 81 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 309 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Professor | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 14% |
| Unknown | 70 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 78 | 25% |
| Psychology | 51 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 13 | 4% |
| Engineering | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 100 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#233,039
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#376
of 1,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,083
of 449,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#17
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 155.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.