| Title |
Long-term Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Low-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.8006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amar U. Kishan, Audrey Dang, Alan J. Katz, Constantine A. Mantz, Sean P. Collins, Nima Aghdam, Fang-I Chu, Irving D. Kaplan, Limor Appelbaum, Donald B. Fuller, Robert M. Meier, D. Andrew Loblaw, Patrick Cheung, Huong T. Pham, Narek Shaverdian, Naomi Jiang, Ye Yuan, Hilary Bagshaw, Nicolas Prionas, Mark K. Buyyounouski, Daniel E. Spratt, Patrick W. Linson, Robert L. Hong, Nicholas G. Nickols, Michael L. Steinberg, Patrick A. Kupelian, Christopher R. King |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 11% |
| Spain | 10 | 10% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 64% |
| Scientists | 24 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 19% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 20% |
| Unknown | 54 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 44% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 75 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
#197,004
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#1,565
of 9,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,330
of 449,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#27
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.