| Title |
How will Brexit affect health services in the UK? An updated evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30425-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nick Fahy, Tamara Hervey, Scott Greer, Holly Jarman, David Stuckler, Mike Galsworthy, Martin McKee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,174 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1433 | 45% |
| United States | 84 | 3% |
| Australia | 30 | <1% |
| Ireland | 28 | <1% |
| Canada | 27 | <1% |
| France | 23 | <1% |
| Spain | 16 | <1% |
| Myanmar | 15 | <1% |
| Germany | 14 | <1% |
| Other | 144 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1360 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2259 | 71% |
| Scientists | 426 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 411 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 78 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 36 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2905. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,368
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#129
of 42,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33
of 368,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#4
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.