| Title |
Physical Activity Communication: A Scoping Review of the Literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Promotion Practice, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1524839919834272 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline D. Bergeron, Andrea H. Tanner, Daniela B. Friedman, Yue Zheng, Courtney S. Schrock, Daniel B. Bornstein, Michelle Segar, Natalie Swift |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 16% |
| Australia | 6 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 39% |
| Scientists | 24 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#936,063
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from Health Promotion Practice
#39
of 1,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,784
of 360,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Promotion Practice
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.