↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Analysis of State-Specific Differences in Childhood Vaccination Coverage in Rural India

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccines, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of State-Specific Differences in Childhood Vaccination Coverage in Rural India
Published in
Vaccines, February 2019
DOI 10.3390/vaccines7010024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nijika Shrivastwa, Abram L. Wagner, Matthew L. Boulton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 10 18%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 22 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,245,084
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Vaccines
#578
of 4,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,342
of 366,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccines
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.