| Title |
A temporary indwelling intravascular aphaeretic system for in vivo enrichment of circulating tumor cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-09439-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tae Hyun Kim, Yang Wang, C. Ryan Oliver, Douglas H. Thamm, Laura Cooling, Costanza Paoletti, Kaylee J. Smith, Sunitha Nagrath, Daniel F. Hayes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 33% |
| India | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Japan | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 55% |
| Scientists | 15 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 51 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 320. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#106,345
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,543
of 57,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,129
of 365,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#32
of 1,357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.