↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Frequent somatic CDH1 loss-of-function mutations in plasmacytoid variant bladder cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
150 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Frequent somatic CDH1 loss-of-function mutations in plasmacytoid variant bladder cancer
Published in
Nature Genetics, February 2016
DOI 10.1038/ng.3503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie, Gopa Iyer, Byron H Lee, Sasinya N Scott, Rohit Mehra, Aditya Bagrodia, Emmet J Jordan, Sizhi Paul Gao, Ricardo Ramirez, Eugene K Cha, Neil B Desai, Emily C Zabor, Irina Ostrovnaya, Anuradha Gopalan, Ying-Bei Chen, Samson W Fine, Satish K Tickoo, Anupama Gandhi, Joseph Hreiki, Agnès Viale, Maria E Arcila, Guido Dalbagni, Jonathan E Rosenberg, Bernard H Bochner, Dean F Bajorin, Michael F Berger, Victor E Reuter, Barry S Taylor, David B Solit

Abstract

Plasmacytoid bladder cancer is an aggressive histologic variant with a high risk of disease-specific mortality. Using whole-exome and targeted sequencing, we find that truncating somatic alterations in the CDH1 gene occur in 84% of plasmacytoid carcinomas and are specific to this histologic variant. Consistent with the aggressive clinical behavior of plasmacytoid carcinomas, which frequently recur locally, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of CDH1 in bladder cancer cells enhanced cell migration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#454,879
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#912
of 7,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,886
of 313,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#21
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.