| Title |
Role of US LI-RADS in the LI-RADS Algorithm.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
RadioGraphics, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1148/rg.2019180158 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuchi K Rodgers, David T Fetzer, Helena Gabriel, James H Seow, Hailey H Choi, Katherine E Maturen, Ashish P Wasnik, Tara A Morgan, Nirvikar Dahiya, Mary K O'Boyle, Yuko Kono, Claude B Sirlin, Aya Kamaya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 31% |
| Italy | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 6% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 28% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,195,254
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from RadioGraphics
#184
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,917
of 363,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RadioGraphics
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.