| Title |
Paradoxical lucidity: A potential paradigm shift for the neurobiology and treatment of severe dementias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.04.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George A. Mashour, Lori Frank, Alexander Batthyany, Ann Marie Kolanowski, Michael Nahm, Dena Schulman‐Green, Bruce Greyson, Serguei Pakhomov, Jason Karlawish, Raj C. Shah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 16 | 11% |
| Spain | 12 | 8% |
| United States | 9 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 129 | 90% |
| Scientists | 8 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#150,832
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#105
of 4,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,858
of 368,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#3
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.