| Title |
Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression-Free and Overall Survival following Open versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis from the RAZOR Trial with a 3-Year Followup.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Urology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ju.0000000000000565 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivek Venkatramani, Isildinha M Reis, Erik P Castle, Mark L Gonzalgo, Michael E Woods, Robert S Svatek, Alon Z Weizer, Badrinath R Konety, Mathew Tollefson, Tracey L Krupski, Norm D Smith, Ahmad Shabsigh, Daniel A Barocas, Marcus L Quek, Atreya Dash, Adam S Kibel, Raj S Pruthi, Jeffrey Scott Montgomery, Christopher J Weight, David S Sharp, Sam S Chang, Michael S Cookson, Gopal N Gupta, Alex Gorbonos, Edward M Uchio, Eila Skinner, Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash, Maria F Becerra, Sanjaya Swain, Kerri Kendrick, Joseph A Smith, Ian M Thompson, Dipen J Parekh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 179 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 47 | 26% |
| Spain | 13 | 7% |
| France | 8 | 4% |
| India | 7 | 4% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| Belgium | 5 | 3% |
| Mexico | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 45 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 98 | 55% |
| Scientists | 41 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 39% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#332,794
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#1
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,961
of 357,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them