| Title |
Perioperative Outcomes and Trends in the Use of Robotic Colectomy for Medicare Beneficiaries From 2010 Through 2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Surgery, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyle H. Sheetz, Edward C. Norton, Justin B. Dimick, Scott E. Regenbogen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 38% |
| Scientists | 32 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2022.
All research outputs
#628,182
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#637
of 5,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,717
of 474,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#17
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.