| Title |
Association of a Workplace Sales Ban on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages With Employee Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4434 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elissa S. Epel, Alison Hartman, Laurie M. Jacobs, Cindy Leung, Michael A. Cohn, Leeane Jensen, Laura Ishkanian, Janet Wojcicki, Ashley E. Mason, Robert H. Lustig, Kimber L. Stanhope, Laura A. Schmidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 413 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 78 | 19% |
| Spain | 32 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 8% |
| Argentina | 20 | 5% |
| Australia | 15 | 4% |
| Mexico | 12 | 3% |
| Canada | 12 | 3% |
| India | 5 | 1% |
| South Africa | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 45 | 11% |
| Unknown | 158 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 277 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 77 | 19% |
| Scientists | 51 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 562. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#43,168
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#383
of 11,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#977
of 479,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#9
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.