↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Thank You to Our 2018 Peer Reviewers
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, November 2019
DOI 10.1029/2019gl084031
Authors

Harihar Rajaram, Noah Diffenbaugh, Suzana Camargo, M. Bayani Cardenas, Rebecca Carey, Kim Cobb, Rose Cory, Meghan Cronin, Andrew Dombard, Kathleen Donohue, Lucy Flesch, Alessandra Giannini, Gavin Hayes, Andrew Hogg, Tatiana Ilyina, Valeriy Ivanov, Steven Jacobsen, Monika Korte, Gang Lu, Mathieu Morlighem, Gudrun Magnusdottir, Andrew Newman, Merav Opher, Paola Passalacqua, Christina Patricola, Jeroen Ritsema, Janet Sprintall, Hui Su, Joel Thornton, Paul Williams, Andrew Yau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#20,587,621
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#16,347
of 19,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,854
of 366,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#275
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.