↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Bowel Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 12,425)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1878 Mendeley
Title
Bowel Disorders
Published in
Gastroenterology, February 2016
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian E. Lacy, Fermín Mearin, Lin Chang, William D. Chey, Anthony J. Lembo, Magnus Simren, Robin Spiller

Abstract

Functional bowel disorders are highly prevalent disorders found worldwide. These disorders have the potential to affect all members of society, regardless of age, gender, race, creed, color or socioeconomic status. Improving our understanding of functional bowel disorders (FBD) is critical as they impose a negative economic impact to the global health care system in addition to reducing quality of life. Research in the basic and clinical sciences during the past decade has produced new information on the epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of FBDs. These important findings created a need to revise the Rome III criteria for FBDs, last published in 2006. This manuscript classifies the FBDs into five distinct categories: irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); functional constipation (FC); functional diarrhea (FDr); functional abdominal bloating/distention (FAB/D); and unspecified FBD (U-FBD). Also included in this article is a new sixth category, opioid induced constipation (OIC) which is distinct from the functional bowel disorders (FBDs). Each disorder will first be defined, followed by sections on epidemiology, rationale for changes from prior criteria, clinical evaluation, physiologic features, psychosocial features and treatment. It is the hope of this committee that this new information will assist both clinicians and researchers in the decade to come.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,878 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1866 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 267 14%
Student > Master 198 11%
Researcher 167 9%
Other 149 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 7%
Other 356 19%
Unknown 609 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 618 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 155 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 64 3%
Other 191 10%
Unknown 695 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 485. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#55,445
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#45
of 12,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#917
of 315,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#6
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.